Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Public health policy and health economics

4816 - Using the ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Metrics and Standards to Improve Value, Meaningful Use of Resources and Reduce Waste.

Date

09 Sep 2017

Session

Public health policy and health economics

Presenters

Carlos Pinto

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v395-v402. 10.1093/annonc/mdx375

Authors

C.F. Pinto, F. Loiola, T. Garcia, E. Romano, L. Altoe, L. Garcia, D. Oliveira, A. Rodrigo, H.Z. Fernandes

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, 12245750 - Sao Jose dos Campos/BR
More

Resources

Abstract 4816

Background

The Institute of Oncology (IOV) is using the ASCO’s QOPI since 2013 in Brazil. QOPI is a retrospective analysis by data abstraction submited to a database pulling over 180 quality measures based on care guidelines and expert consensus. Data collection are twice a year and provides reports based on practice wide data sample comparing overall quality score for the practice and for the participants aggregate.

Methods

IOV participates in rounds at least once a year. At each round current performance is reviewed and select gaps are translated into improvement projects that focus on meaningful use of resources, safety, accountability of care, and value. Meaningful use of PET-CT; lab tests; and G-CSF are samples of specific projects the past. IOV's Patient Navigation System (PNS) was adapted to track QOPI standards/measures that are monitored by clinical navigators as checkpoints in real time transitions of care and handovers. Potentially hazardous checkpoints are actively chased using a daily signaling process.

Results

Between Feb/2016 and Mar/2017, the PNS checked 9,372 patient iteractions (surgery, exams, outside appointments, optimal sequencing of care); 138 (1.5%) potentially hazardous events were identififed and managed in advance: missing “readiness to care data” and lab tests (36%); delayed radiation or chemo (38%); delayed surgery (7%); and missing echocardiogram for patients using cardiotoxic drugs (6%). The Pain Management Navigation System was created to meet another set of QOPI measures that also translated into 17% reduction of emergency room admissions for 141 patients involved. A dedicated flow was created to meet oral chemo standards, and patient satisfaction improved from 67% to 93% by reducing door-to-door time from 40 to 12 minutes, including check in, interview, drug refill and reconciliation.

Conclusions

One of the big challenges of healthcare is how to introduce changes that translates into real improvements. The use of evidence-based measures and standards to evaluate quality of care provides a clear and straight path to deliver higher value; meaningful use of resources; focus and alignment for improvements initiatives where it matters most: patient care and outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Instituto de Oncologia do Vale

Funding

None

Disclosure

C.F. Pinto: Board Member at Institute of Oncology. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings