Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

2937 - Is objective response rate (ORR) a valid primary endpoint in phase 2 trials (Ph2t) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for advanced solid cancers?

Date

10 Sep 2017

Session

Poster display session

Presenters

Georgia Ritchie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v403-v427. 10.1093/annonc/mdx376

Authors

G. Ritchie1, H. Gasper2, J. Man3, S. Lord4, M. Friedlander1, C. Lee4, I. Marschner4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medicine, University of New South Wales, 1466146620 - Sydney/AU
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Coffs Harbour Hospital, 24502450 - Sydney/AU
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, 2145 - Sydney/AU
  • 4 University Of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney/AU
More

Resources

Abstract 2937

Background

ORR is commonly used as the primary endpoint in Ph2t. ICI have different mechanisms of action to chemotherapy or molecular targeted agents (MTA). The validity of ORR as a surrogate for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with ICI is uncertain and may differ by tumor type. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in advanced solid cancers that compared ICI to chemotherapy, MTA or placebo to address this question.

Methods

We performed a literature search to determine the current Ph2t designs used in ICI trials. Efficacy data from single-arm trials and RCTs were extracted. Amongst the RCTs, correlations between ORR odds ratio (OR) with PFS hazard ratio (HR) and OS HR were examined for between randomized arms comparisons. Correlations within ICI treatment arms of the RCTs between ORR with PFS and OS rates were also studied. Using data from the RCTs, multivariable models that examined the relationships between ORR, 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates were developed and their predictive performances validated in the single-arm trials.

Results

Of 87 Ph2ts identified, most were single arm design (68%), and only 10% were RCTs with concurrent standard of care arms. ORR was the most common (60%) primary endpoint and PFS was uncommon (8%). A total of 20 RCTs (4 Ph2t and 16 phase 3 trials) with mature data were examined. There were 25 treatment comparisons in 8 different tumors (non-small cell lung cancer 44%, melanoma 24%). For RCTs in all tumors, the correlations (r) between ORR OR with PFS HR, ORR OR with OS HR, and PFS HR with OS HR were 0.63, 0.57 and 0.42 respectively. Within the ICI arms, r between ORR with 6-month PFS, ORR with 12-month OS, and 6-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.37, 0.08 and 0.74 respectively. In the single-arm trials dataset, we were able to accurately predict 12-month OS using the actual 6-month PFS with the multivariate model developed from our RCTs dataset. Conversely, when ORR was used to predict 6-month PFS or 12-month OS, there was poor agreement between actual and predicted results.

Conclusions

These data do not support the use of ORR as a surrogate for OS in ICI trials. In future ICI Ph2t, 6-month PFS should be the primary endpoint rather than ORR.

Clinical trial identification

Not applicable

Legal entity responsible for the study

Not applicable

Funding

None

Disclosure

M. Friedlander: Receives personal fees and grants with an advisory board position with AstraZeneca. Does not have any patents planned, pending or issued, broadly relevant to the work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.