Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

4179 - Deliberative democracy and cancer screening. The use of citizens' s juries in health policy decision-making


10 Sep 2017


Poster display session


Alicia Quilez Cutillas


Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v502-v506. 10.1093/annonc/mdx383


A. Quilez Cutillas1, P. Rosado-Varela2, V. Luque-Ribelles3, S. Márquez Calderón1, E. Benitez-Rodríguez1, J.M. Ribera-Bautista1, J.M. Baena-Canada4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Hospital Puerta del Mar, 11009 - Cadiz/ES
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Hospital Puerto Real, 1111 - Puerto Real/ES
  • 3 Psicología, Universidad de Cádiz, 11 - Puerto Real/ES
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Puerta del Mar Hospital, 11009 - Cadiz/ES


Abstract 4179


Participants in breast cancer screening programmes may benefit from early detection but may also be exposed to the risks of overdiagnosis and false positives. It is argued that citizens’s juries offer important insights into how democratic deliberation could be institutionalised in contemporary political decision making processes. The aim of this deliberative democracy study was to know if Andalucia‘s Public Health System should offer screening mammography for women aged 50 and 69 years. We selected a citizens’s jury to evaluate the reasons for their decision and to know the recommendations for politicians.


Thirteen women aged 50 and 69 years, who regularly participate in the breast cancer screening programme, agreed to participate as a jury to deliberate of the harms and benefits of this controversial topic. The participants were assembled on three consecutive days. On the first day a neutral expert trained the jury to understand the exposures during the second day of two expert witnesses positioned in favor of and against screening mammography, respectively. The third the jury deliberated, extracted its conclusions, cast its vote and exposed its recommendations for politicians. Transcription of the text and the qualitative analysis of the information was done with the support of the ATLAS.ti software.


We observed an improvement in the knowledge using analysis quantitative design. The Citizen`s Jury voted 11-2. Eleven women voted yes and two did not. Women thanks for it, but there are still ignorance and confusion about breast cancer screening. There are three reasons for voting yes, for their health, for the nature of the test and for their individual freedom. There are women who argue the lack of effectiveness and the cost to justify their negative vote to mammography, at least with a universal character. Women make proposals to policymakers related to improving information, psychological care and research.


Spanish women have a very positive attitude to breast cancer screening although the information transmitted changes the opinion of some women, who want an informed decision making. They bet to maintain or increase the medicalization of their lives.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Dr. José Manuel Baena Cañada


Fundación Progreso y Salud de investigación biomédica. PI-0130-2014


All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.