Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and tertiary lymphoid structures in paired primary tumors and metastases from breast cancer patients

Date

10 Oct 2016

Session

Poster display

Presenters

Cinzia Solinas

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2016) 27 (6): 545-551. 10.1093/annonc/mdw393

Authors

C. Solinas1, A. Boisson1, D. Brown2, R. de Wind3, G. van den Eynden1, S. Garaud1, L. Buisseret1, C. Naveaux1, C. Sotiriou2, D. Larsimont3, M. Piccart4, K. Willard-Gallo1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Molecular Immunology Unit, Institute Jules Bordet, 1000 - Brussels/BE
  • 2 Bctl - Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institute Jules Bordet, 1000 - Brussels/BE
  • 3 Department Of Pathology, Institute Jules Bordet, 1000 - Brussels/BE
  • 4 Medicine Department, Institute Jules Bordet, 1000 - Brussels/BE
More

Resources

Background

In primary tumors (P), infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) have been associated with better clinical outcomes, in HER2+ and triple negative breast cancer (BC). The temporal and spatial heterogeneity of TIL and TLS between P and their matched metastases (M) is currently unknown.

Methods

We analyzed formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples from a retrospective cohort of BC patients who underwent adjuvant surgery for the P and metastasectomy or biopsy for their metachronous M at a distant site(s) (n = 51). Immunohistochemistry stained sections using anti-CD3 (T cells) and anti-CD20 (B cells) antibodies in a double stain were scored by two trained pathologists blinded to the clinical data. TIL were scored as the percent (%) of stroma plus tumor surface area infiltrated with CD3+ plus CD20+ cells. The number of TLS were normalized to the tumor area.

Results

The extent of TIL in P (range 1-35%) was significantly higher with respect to the corresponding M (p = 0.04). Interestingly, when the extent of TIL in P was ≥10% (=TIL+) there was a significant decrease in the %TIL detected in M (p 

Conclusions

These preliminary data suggest that tumors can alter their immunogenicity during disease progression by their production of neoantigens and/or immunosuppressive factors, which potentially accounts for our observed differences between P and M. In metastatic disease, the extent of immune infiltration is globally lower than in early disease with almost no TLS found in M, signifying that the composition and organization of the immune infiltrate varies between disease stages. The extent of the immune infiltrate may also depend upon the organ site of relapse, further complicating the heterogeneity of both the tumor and the anti-tumor immune response.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Universitè Libre de Bruxelles

Funding

Les Amis de l'Institut Jules Bordet

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings