Treatment paradigms in lung NET have conventionally relied on therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and somatostatin analogs (SSA) although evidence from randomized clinical trials remains limited. In the recent subgroup analysis of a large, phase 3, RADIANT-4 study everolimus (EVE), an mTOR inhibitor showed clinically meaningful 6-month improvement in PFS [EVE vs placebo (PBO): 9.2 (6.8-10.9) vs 3.6 (1.9-5.1) mos] and reduced tumor progression risk by 50% (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88) in patients with advanced, progressive, nonfunctional lung NET compared to PBO (Fazio et al. 2016 ENETS). This post-hoc analysis evaluates the impact of prior-therapies on EVE treatment in lung NET patients from the RADIANT-4 study.
Patients with advanced non-functional lung or GI NET were randomized (2:1) to EVE 10 mg/d or PBO, both with best supportive care. Subgroups of patients who received SSA, chemo-, radio- or no prior therapy within the lung NET subgroup were analyzed.
Of the 90 patients with lung NET enrolled in the RADIANT-4 study; 63 patients were randomized to the EVE arm and 27 patients to the PBO arm. Median age, 65 years; males: 52%; most pts (99%) had well-differentiated disease; Caucasian: 86%; WHO PS 0/1/2: 71%/28%/1%. Prior therapies (EVE vs PBO) included: SSA (mostly for tumor growth control; 43% vs 41%), radiotherapy including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT; 40% vs 48%), chemotherapy (40% vs 48%) and no prior therapy (14% vs 11%). Median PFS in the subgroups of patients receiving each of the prior-therapies is listed in the Table. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs; ≥ 30% incidence in either arm for the whole lung subgroup) were stomatitis, rash and fatigue.
|Prior-therapies||EVE Median PFS, mos (95% CI)||PBO Median PFS, mos (95% CI)|
|Chemotherapy||8.5 (5.6,11.7)||2.9 (1.8,3.7)|
|Radiotherapy*||9.2 (5.7,NE)||3.0 (1.9,5.1)|
|SSA therapy||9.5 (6.0,11.7)||3.7 (1.0,11.2)|
|No prior therapy||9.7 (0.9,NE)||3.6 (1.7,NE)|
EVE showed PFS benefit in patients with advanced lung NET regardless of prior-therapies, consistently with the overall RADIANT-4 study. No prior-therapy specific safety signal was seen in any of the subgroups.
Clinical trial identification
Legal entity responsible for the study
R. Buzzoni: Grants and non-financial support from Novartis, grants from Otsuka, grants and non-financial support from Italfarmaco, non-financial support from Ipsen, during the conduct of the study.
J. Strosberg: Grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, personal fees from Bayer, Genentech, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Ipsen, Lexicon, Novartis, outside the submitted work.
M. Voi, A. Ridolfi, L. Bubuteishvili-Pacaud: Employment- Novartis.
F. Herbst: Employment- Novartis, Stock options- Novartis.
E. Wolin: Advisory Board- Advanced accelerator applications.
N. Fazio: Grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Ipsen, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Italfarmaco, Ipsen, Lexicon, outside the submitted work .
All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.