Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Characteristics and level of integration of ESMO Designated Centres of integrated oncology and palliative care

Date

08 Oct 2016

Session

Supportive and palliative care

Presenters

David Hui

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2016) 27 (6): 455-461. 10.1093/annonc/mdw384

Authors

D. Hui1, N. Cherny2, N. Latino3, F. Strasser4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Palliative Care And Rehabilitation Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030-4095 - Houston/US
  • 2 Dept Medical Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre Oncology Institute, 91031 - Jerusalem/IL
  • 3 Palliative Care Working Group, ESMO, 6962 - Lugano/CH
  • 4 Dept Of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 - St. Gallen/CH
More

Resources

Abstract 3229

Background

The ESMO Designated Centres (ESMO-DCs) of Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care (PC) Incentive Programme has grown steadily and now includes 180 centres in 40 countries. We conducted a survey to determine the characteristics and level of integration of PC services at ESMO-DCs.

Methods

An electronic survey was sent to leaders of all ESMO-DCs between April and May 2016. The survey consisted of 78 questions examining the DC characteristics, palliative care clinical programme (structure, processes, outcomes), education, research and attitudes and beliefs toward the ESMO-DC programme. The level of integration was assessed based on 13 criteria developed from a Delphi survey (Hui et al. Ann Oncol 2015).

Results

The response rate was 77% (139/180). 105 (76%) ESMO-DCs were from Europe, 50 (36%) were tertiary care cancer centres and 30 (22%) were tertiary care general hospitals. The median number of beds was 550 (interquartile range [IQR] 277-925). 131 (94%) had inpatient consultation teams, 106 (76%) had outpatient palliative care clinics, 88 (63%) had dedicated acute care beds, and 75 (54%) offered community-based PC. 132 (95%) had an interdisciplinary team, and 90 (65%) had dually certified palliative oncologists. These programmes reported that a median of 70% (IQR 28-80%) of patients with advanced cancer had a PC consultation before death. The estimated median time between PC consultation and death was 60 days (IQR 14-120 days) for outpatients and 20 days (IQR 10-42 days) for inpatients. In regard to education, 55 (40%) offered PC fellowship programmes; 43 (31%) had mandatory PC rotations for oncology fellows; 71 (51%) offered didactic PC curriculum for oncology fellows; 102 (73%) offered combined educational activities; and 104 (75%) provided continuing medical education for oncologists. All ESMO-DCs reported PC research activity in the past 3 years, with pain being the most common topic (N = 99, 71%). Most centres (>80%) perceived the ESMO-DC programme to increase their status.

Conclusions

The ESMO-DCs had high level of PC infrastructure and provided PC access to a large proportion of patients with advanced cancer. Areas for improvement include timing of referral, clinical processes of integration and educational components.

Clinical trial identification

Not applicable

Legal entity responsible for the study

ESMO

Funding

ESMO

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings