1222P - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (IC) induce paradoxical progression in a subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Date 08 October 2016
Event ESMO 2016 Congress
Session Poster Display
Topics Immunotherapy
Non-small-cell lung cancer
Therapy
Presenter Jihene Lahmar
Citation Annals of Oncology (2016) 27 (6): 416-454. 10.1093/annonc/mdw383
Authors J. Lahmar1, L. Mezquita Pérez1, S. Koscielny2, F. Facchinetti1, M.V. Bluthgen1, J. Adam3, A. Gazzah1, J. Remon1, D. Planchard1, J. Soria1, C. Caramella4, B. Besse1
  • 1Department Of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94800 - Villejuif/FR
  • 2Department Of Biostatistics, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif/FR
  • 3Department Of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - villejuif/FR
  • 4Department Of Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - villejuif/FR

Abstract

Background

Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (IC) represent a major step forward in treating advanced NSCLC by improving survival and clinical outcomes. In patients (pts) with non-squamous NSCLC PDL1 negative NSCLC, IC increases the risk of early death compared to docetaxel. Risks later reversed for the two study groups to increasingly favor IC, as reflected in the eventual crossing of the Kaplan–Meier curves. Tumor Growth Rate (TGR) integrates tumoral dynamics and kinetics. Therefore, TGR gives additional information vs RECIST criteria. We hypothesized that TGR could identify a subset of pts in which IC could accelerate tumor progression, leading to early death.

Methods

We performed a clinical and radiological retrospective case study of all NSCLC pts treated by IC in a single institution between Dec. 12 and Feb. 16. For each patient, CT scan during immunotherapy and previous treatment were centrally reviewed by a senior radiologist and assessed according to RECIST criteria. We calculated TGR at baseline of IC (baseline CTscan (n) vs n-1 CTscan) and TGR during IC (n + 2 CTscan vs n + 1 CTscan). We further estimated the difference (deltaTGR) between TGR during IC and TGR at baseline. deltaTGR0 means that the treatment speeds up tumor growth.

Results

89 pts were eligible. 58% were male, median age 60 (41-78); 15% never smokers. 62 pts had adenocarcinoma, 21 squamous and 6 other histologies. Mutational status was unknown for 14 pts; 36% wild type, 9 pts EGFRmut, 25 pts KRASmut. PDL1 expression was positive in 25 pts, unknown in 57 pts. 52 pts (58%) received nivolumab, 25 pembrolizumab and 12 atezolizumab. During IC, deltaTGR was 0 in 20 pts. Among the 20 pts with deltaTGR > 0, 9 had a deltaTGR > 50%, meaning that tumor growth, expressed as percent increase in tumor volume per month, increased by at least 50% during IC. Clinical characteristics (age, sex, smoking status, pathology) of the 9 pts were not different from other pts.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that IC increased tumor progression in around 10% pts and thus could illustrate a deleterious effect in this subset of pts. Further work is needed to confirm this finding and characterize this population.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Dr Benjamin BESSE

Funding

Gustave Roussy

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.