Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

444P - The prophylactic effect of 0.1% fluorometholone eye drops on eye disorders caused by high-dose cytarabine

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Takayuki Tsuchiya

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix140-ix150. 10.1093/annonc/mdz434

Authors

T. Tsuchiya1, T. Kume1, K. Akiyama1, K. Yoshitsugu2, M. Fukaya2, T. Enami2, R. Tatara2, M. Shino1, T. Ikeda2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Pharmacy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 411-0934 - Shizuoka/JP
  • 2 Division Of Hematology And Stem Cell Transplantation, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 4110934 - Shizuoka/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 444P

Background

High-dose cytarabine (HDAC) is used to treat hematologic malignancies. Eye disorders are common side effects caused by cytarabine (AraC) being transported from the blood into tear fluid. In our institution, four times a day (FM4) or six times a day (FM6) of 0.1% fluorometholone eye drops are used to prevent AraC-induced eye disorders. In this study, we investigated the prophylactic effects of FM6 or FM4 to prevent AraC-induced eye disorders retrospectively.

Methods

We targeted the patients who were hospitalized and administered with HDAC twice a day at a dose of 1 g/m2 or more between April 2011 and March 2018. The patients received 0.1% fluorometholone eye drops in a both eyes from the start of HDAC dose to 48 hours after the end of HDAC dose. We investigated the incidence of eye disorders or grade based on the medical records from the start of HDAC dose until 7 days after the end of HDAC dose, retrospectively.

Results

There were 36 patients of FM4 and 44 of FM6 for prevention of AraC-induced eye disorders, respectivity. The incidence of eye disorders was 6 (16.7%) in FM4 and 7 (15.9%) in FM6. No Grade 3 eye disorders occurred in both groups. The number of courses of the eye disorder appeared for FM4 and FM6 were 1 and 2 courses. In addition, the median of AraC cumulative dose at the time of the eye disorders appeared for FM4 and FM6 was 10 (4-20) g/m2 and 20 (6-42) g/m2.

Conclusions

There is no difference in preventive effect between FM4 and FM6 for AraC-induced eye disorders. Further, FM4 is considered useful and a convenient method for the prevention of AraC-induced eye disorders.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.