Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

280P - Risk stratification of CML-CP in a real-world scenario, comparison of S.H.E. with rate of fall of BCR/ABL

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Leukaemias

Presenters

Kundan Mishra

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix91-ix96. 10.1093/annonc/mdz427

Authors

K. Mishra, U. Yanamandra, A. Shukla, S.K. Pramanik, R. Kapoor, S. Das

Author affiliations

  • Clinical Haematology, Army Hospital (R&R), 110010 - New Delhi/IN

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 280P

Background

Multiple studies in the past have elaborated the role of different risks stratification scores such as Sokal, Hasford, and Eutos (S.H.E.). These studies either correlated the risk stratification with survival, PFS, CcyR, MMR, or point BCR-ABL at different time intervals post-TKI. However, as we understand, all patients do not have a similar disease burden at the initiation of TKI. Also, using cut off level for different age group, gender, and disease burdens is an oversimplification of the disease remission criteria. There are very few studies on the rate (velocity) of the fall of BCR-ABL. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of various prognostic score in predicting the fall in BCR ABL over two years.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study comprising 653 (sample size predicted: 300) patients managed at a tertiary care center in north India based on a uniform treatment and evaluation protocol (Generic Imatinib 400 mg OD and three monthly RQ-PCR-BCR/ABL-IS). Statistics were done using Python-13.

Results

The median age of the study population was 43 years (16-87). On comparing the three risk groups of Sokal, the high-risk patients had the least fall in BCR-ABL at any time point up to 2 years post intiation of TKI. Whereas, there was no difference between low and intermediate risk. The difference in the three groups was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference in the rate of fall of BCR/ABL in the three risk groups of Hasford. The two risk groups of Eutos score had a significant difference in the rate of fall of BCR/ABL, the high risk having a lower rate in comparison to low risk.

Conclusions

Of the three scoring systems, the EUTOS score outperforms as a prognostic model using rate of fall of BCR-ABL in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients upto two years on Generic Imatinib.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

NA.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.