Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

219P - Long-term outcomes of bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Amanda Dania Satiti

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix71-ix76. 10.1093/annonc/mdz425

Authors

A.D. Satiti1, H. Mistry2, Y.P. Song3, A. Choudhury3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Faculty Of Biology, Medicine, And Health, University of Manchester, M12 9PL - Manchester/GB
  • 2 Faculty Of Biology, Medicine, And Health, University of Manchester, Manchester/GB
  • 3 Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 219P

Background

Radical radiotherapy is the mainstay of bladder preservation treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. The concurrent use of radiosensitisers improves patient outcome (Caffo et al., 2016, Hoskin et al., 2010). However, different factors may preclude patients from receiving radiosensitisers. This retrospective study evaluates the survival and toxicity outcomes of bladder preservation treatment in a tertiary cancer centre.

Methods

Patients treated with radical radiotherapy from 2010 to 2017 were divided into two groups depending on whether they received radiosensitisers in addition to radiotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was rate of late toxicities. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to analyse OS. Late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were defined as treatment-related toxicities at 1-year post-treatment, assessed on the LENT/SOMA scale.

Results

A total of 428 patients were included in the survival analysis. 303 patients had combination treatment while 125 patients had radiotherapy alone. Patients in the combination group were younger (median age 72 vs 81, p < 0.001), have better performance status (PS 0-2 298 (95%) vs 115 (92%), p < 0.001), and fewer comorbidities compared to patients in radiotherapy alone group. The median follow-up for this study was 56 months. The median OS was 76 months (95% CI: 66-NA) in radiosensitiser group compared to 13 months in radiotherapy only group (95% CI: 13-21) (p < 0.001, HR = 3.09 (95% CI: 2.32-4.12)). As shown in the table, the incidence of late toxicity was low in both groups and formal analysis could not be carried out.

Table: 219P Rates of late toxicities following radical radiotherapy

Combination (N = 303)Radiotherapy (N = 125)
GU Toxicity
Any grade119 (39.3%)2 (1.6%)
Grade 3-44 (1.3%)1 (0.8%)
GI Toxicity
Any grade133 (43.9%)2 (1.6%)
Grade 3-44 (1.3%)0 (0%)

Conclusions

The survival outcome with radiosensitisation in this real-world retrospective study is in keeping with published data. Bladder preservation is effective with minimal long-term toxicities. Patients with localised MIBC should be offered the option of bladder preservation treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Radiotherapy-Related Research Group, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.