Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

300P - Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for localized stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Ming-Yuan Chen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix97-ix106. 10.1093/annonc/mdz428

Authors

M. Chen, L. You-Ping, X. Zou, X. Lv, Y. Hua, M. Hong

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 300P

Background

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as primary curative treatment for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the radiation-related complications and relatively high medical costs cannot be ignored. We examined whether endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) could be an effective alternative treatment for localized stage I NPC.

Methods

Ten newly diagnosed localized stage I NPC patients received ENPG alone from June 2007 to September 2017 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The survival outcomes, quality of life (QOL), and medical costs were collected. Simultaneously, data for 329 stage I NPC patients treated with IMRT were collected as a reference.

Results

After a median follow-up of 59.0 months (95%CI 53.4-64.6), no death, locoregional recurrence, or distant metastasis was observed in the 10 ENPG-treated patients. The 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, regional relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival among the ENPG-treated patients was similar to that among the IMRT-treated patients (100% vs. 99.1%, 100% vs. 97.7%, 100% vs. 99.0%, 100% vs. 97.4%, respectively, P > 0.05). In addition, compared with IMRT, ENPG was associated with decreased total medical costs ($4090.42±1502.65 vs. 12620.88±4242.65, P < 0.001) and improved QOL scores including dry mouth (3.3 ± 10.5 vs. 34.4 ± 25.8, P < 0.001) and sticky saliva (3.3 ± 10.5 vs. 32.6 ± 23.3, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

ENPG alone was associated with promising long-term survival outcomes, low medical costs, and excellent QOL and might therefore be an alternative strategy for treating newly diagnosed localized stage I NPC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Mingyuan Chen.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.