Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

425P - Economic and safety evaluation of 5-HT3 recepter antagonist conversion from palonosetron to granisetron in highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: A prospective study

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Keisuke Yamakita

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix140-ix150. 10.1093/annonc/mdz434

Authors

K. Yamakita1, Y. Kitano1, Y. Suzuki2, H. Iwamoto2, K. Takahashi2, T. Ota2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Metabolism And Biosystemic Science, Department Of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, 078-8510 - Asahikawa/JP
  • 2 Division Of Metabolism And Biosystemic Science, Department Of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 425P

Background

Palonosetron (PALO) is a second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5HT3RA) that has shown better efficacy than first-generation 5HT3RA (granisetron; GRA) in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). PALO is usually administrated repeatedly when the patients have no nausea even though it is expensive as compared with GRA. However, we could reduce medical costs for chemotherapy if 5HT3RA conversion from PALO to GRA in the patient without having CINV is safe and tolerable.

Methods

We prospectively investigated patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) in combination with PALO for digestive organ cancers in accordance with guideline of Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. Patients assessed as complete response (CR) during the acute phase (0-24 h postchemotherapy) and the delayed phase (24-120 h postchemotherapy) in consecutive treatments were converted their antiemetic agents from PALO to GRA. We evaluated the incidence of CINV and the cost-effectiveness.

Results

Thirty five cases (madian age 73 years, female 51.4%, 18; pancreatic cancer, 8; colorectal cancer, 3; esophageal cancer, 3; gastric cancer, 3; biliary tract cancer) were enrolled at our institution between January 2018 and June 2019. Ten cases were administrated HEC (HEC group) and 25 cases were administrated MEC (MEC group). One case of HEC group and 2 cases of MEC group changed their chemotherapy regimens due to adverse events and progression of disease. Four cases of HEC group (40.0%) and 14 cases of MEC group (56.0%) were assessed as CR in consecutive treatments, thereafter their antiemetic agents were converted from PALO to GRA in the subsequent treatments. All of them continued their chemotherapy without the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Among the cases assessed as CR, we could save 111,935 Japanese yen (1,034.6 USD, range, 13,868-194,152 JPY) per case by conversion of 5HT3RA.

Conclusions

Our data indicated that the conversion of 5HT3RA is safe and also provide economic benefit in patients receiving HEC or MEC. When patients receiving HEC or MEC with PALO were assessed as CR, we should consider conversion of 5HT3RA.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Asahikawa medical University.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.