Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Chien-Hsin Chen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix30-ix41. 10.1093/annonc/mdz421

Authors

C. Chen1, S. Wu2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Colorectal Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei Medical University - Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, 116 - Taipei/TW
  • 2 Director & Attending Physician, Department Of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical, Taipei Medical University - Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, 116 - Taipei/TW

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 91P

Background

To estimate the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma, we use a propensity score-matched (PSM), nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate different adjuvant treatments in high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We minimized the confounding effects with PSM of sex, age, pathologic stages, tumor locations, total cycles of chemotherapy, and Charlson comorbidity index in various adjuvant treatments outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II and III resctable colon adenocarcinoma from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database by dividing them as follows: group 1, those undergoing surgery alone; group 2, those undergoing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone; group 3, those receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) and group 4 those receiving adjuvant folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan (FOFIRIL).

Results

In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, adjusted HRs (aHRs) derived for mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), reported as aHR (95% CI), derived for surgery alone, adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone, and adjuvant FOLFIRI groups compared with the adjuvant FOLFOX group were 1.55 (1.32-1.82), 1.22 (1.05-1.43), and 2.97 (2.43-3.63), respectively. After stratified subgroup analysis, at high-risk stage II, the aHR (95% CI) derived for mortality was 0.52 (0.30-0.89) for the adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone group compared with the group 3.

Conclusions

Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone were more suitable for patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma rather than other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Adjuvant FOLFOX could be the optimal regimen for patients with pathologic stage III colon adenocarcinoma whatever elderly, sex, or tumor locations.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.