Abstract 168P
Background
It is important to predict prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy. Several studies have reported that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which was based on serum albumin (Alb) and C-reactive protein (CRP), was associated with poor prognosis in many cancers. However, it is unclear whether GPS has prognostic value when patients receive Irinotecan, which is a key drug of advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective multicenter study and investigated association between efficacy and GPS in patients who received irinotecan monotherapy between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients had to receive fluoropyrimidine and platinum as prior therapy. GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL.
Results
There were 174 patients at 8 centers included in this study. The number of patients with GPS 0/1/2 was 76/56/42, respectively. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, performance status (0-1/2≤), treatment line 2nd/3rd or later, and HER2 status were significantly different among them(p < 0.01). As for safety, there was no significant difference among GPS 0/1/2 patients. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, median PFS were 3.7/2.8/2.0 months (p < 0.01), median OS were 11.9/7.2/6.7 months (p < 0.01), respectively. In multivariate analysis, GPS was associated with shorter PFS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.180/2.378, 95%C.I. 0.793-1.758/1.405-4.024, p = 0.414/0.001), and shorter OS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.520/2.529, 95%C.I. 1.002-2.305/1.518-4.213, p = 0.049/<0.001).
Conclusions
In this analysis, GPS might be a predictive and prognostic factor in treatment with irinotecan monotherapy for patients with AGC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yoshito Komatsu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4P - Impact of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on tissue expander or implant removal in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Sungmi Jung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
5P - Long-term prognostic effect of hormone receptor subtype on breast cancer
Presenter: Ki-tae Hwang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
6P - Effect of apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting pathologic responses in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy using nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel
Presenter: Yutaka Mizuno
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
7P - Current diagnostic strategy for mammographic microcalcification without specific ultrasound abnormality
Presenter: Naoki Sato
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
8P - Comparison of standard uptake value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer ≥1cm
Presenter: Soeun Park
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
10P - Prognosis and effect of adjuvant treatment in small, node(-), HER2(+) breast cancer
Presenter: Seungtaek Lim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
11P - The prognosis of rare histopathologic subtype of breast cancer
Presenter: Soo Youn Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
12P - Daily collection of physical activity via smartphone application and smart band for development of distress screening tools in breast cancer survivors: A feasibility study
Presenter: Yungil Shin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
13P - Breast cancer distribution in East Azerbaijan, Iran: Results of population-based cancer registry
Presenter: Shima Pashaei
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
14P - Validation of the optimum timing of assessment of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes during preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer
Presenter: Shinichiro Kashiwagi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract