Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

441P - A pilot cross-sectional study on incidence of liver toxicity in cancer patients on western anti-cancer drug therapy with or without concurrent Chinese herbal medicine

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Tsz Him So

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix140-ix150. 10.1093/annonc/mdz434

Authors

T.H. So, Z. Chow, K.S. Chan, K.O. Lam, V.H.F. Lee, H.H. Choi

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, N/A - Hong Kong/HK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 441P

Background

Both Western and Chinese medicine, despite different in methods and systems, are well accepted in Hong Kong. According to a survey on cancer patients in Hong Kong conducted by the Hong Kong Baptist University in 2009, 57% of cancer patients used at least one form of Chinese Medicine therapy. Among those who were on chemotherapy, 60% of them are concurrently receiving Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal therapy. This pilot study addressed the problem of hepatotoxicity of concurrent Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal therapy use, which is the major hurdle of integrated Chinese-Western medicine practice in cancer medicine. We evaluated the difference in incidence of liver toxicity of cancer patients receiving systemic therapy with or without concurrent TCM herbal therapy.

Methods

187 patients were prospectively recruited in the Department of Clinical Oncology of Queen Mary Hospital. Through questionnaires and the online Clinical Management System (CMS), they were followed up for 3 months, their current Western systemic therapy, TCM herbal therapy taken, and liver function tests results (bilirubin, ALT, AST, ALP) were retrieved. Patients were divided into the TCM herbal therapy and non-TCM herbal therapy group, depending on whether TCM herbal therapy was taken concurrently with systemic therapy. Liver function derangement was graded by CTCAE v4.0. The differences between the TCM herbal therapy and non-TCM herbal therapy groups were analysed by Pearson’s chi square test and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazard models to identify the prognostic factors for TCM herbal therapy coverage.

Results

There was no significant difference of liver toxicity incidence between the TCM herbal therapy and non-TCM herbal therapy group(P = 0.577). No prognostic factors (age and sex) were identified for TCM herbal therapy coverage.

Conclusions

The results of our pilot study suggest that concurrent TCM herbal therapy usage by cancer patients does not increase the risk of liver toxicity. Our results warrant further prospective studies to confirm the finding.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.