Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper – Supportive and palliative care

1872 - Long term follow-up (F/U) report of symptomatic cardiac events (SCEs) in 2,809 breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) treated with adjuvant trastuzumab (T) in real world (RW) practice

Date

28 Sep 2019

Session

Proffered Paper – Supportive and palliative care

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management;  Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Serena Di Cosimo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v718-v746. 10.1093/annonc/mdz265

Authors

S. Di Cosimo1, A. Trama2, I. Merlo3, P. Minicozzi4, L. Tarantini5, G. Apolone6, G. Corrao3, M. Franchi3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Applied Research And Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milan/IT
  • 2 Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milan/IT
  • 3 Laboratory Of Healthcare Research And Pharmacoepidemiology Department Of Statistics And Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan/IT
  • 4 Analytical Epidemiology And Health Impact Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milan/IT
  • 5 Department Of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedale San Martino, ASL n. 1, Belluno/IT
  • 6 Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milan/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1872

Background

Clinical trials, focusing on selected pts, may have underestimated toxicities in cases with advanced age and co-morbidities, that are common in RW practice. Furthermore, clinical trials do not provide extended F/U. Thus, we assessed acute and long-term SCEs after adjuvant T in a large/unselected BC pt population.

Methods

Using healthcare administrative database, ie clinical discharge records and drug prescriptions of the Lombardy region (Italy), we selected pts newly diagnosed with early BC between 01/2008 and 12/2011 and monitored until 12/2016. Pts treated with T were 1:2 matched with pts treated with chemotherapy only for age, date of treatment, and cardiovascular risk factors. SCEs included heart failure and cardiomyopathy based on ICD9-CM codes. The cumulative risk of SCEs was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; independent predictors were assessed by the Cox regression model.

Results

Of a cohort of 34,218 pts with incident BC, 2,809 pts treated with T were matched to 5,618 pts treated with chemotherapy only. One SCE during F/U was experienced in 52 (1.8%) of T-users and 88 (0.26%) of non-T users. No cardiac death occurred. The 1-year cumulative risk of SCEs was 0.96%, with 1/4 of SCEs occurring within the first 6 months, in T-users, and 0.16% in non T-users. However, the T-user excess risk disappeared after 1 year of T. Thus, the hazard ratio [HR] was 9.96 (95%CI 3-78-26.2) during the first year, and 1.41 (95%CI 0.99-2.02) during the entire F/U period. HR was higher in the elderly, age>70 years, 8.77 (95%CI 5.25-14.64), and in pts with at least one pre-existing CRFs 2.32 (95%CI 1.68-3.22).

Conclusions

In RW practice, SCEs during/after T are infrequent, early and self-limiting. Based on the timeline of SCEs, it might be unnecessary to monitor cardiac toxicity beyond the period of T treatment. Besides, to reduce the excess of cardiac risk of the first year, strategies including shortening T exposure or increasing the number of check-ups in asymptomatic pts should be accompanied by the development of biomarker(s) able to identify pts at risk before/immediately after T initiation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Serena Di Cosimo.

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC).

Disclosure

S. Di Cosimo: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Teva; Advisory / Consultancy: EpiOnpharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: GSK; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.