Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) results for a randomized phase 2 trial of ipilimumab (IPI) and paclitaxel/carboplatin (P/C) in first-line Stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Publication date: May 19, 2010
Category: Chest tumors
Publisher: ESMO
Authors: T.J. Lynch; Jr; J. Neal; I. Bondarenko; A. Luft; P. Serwatowski; F. Barlesi; R. Chacko; M. Sebastian; J.-M. Cuillerot; M. Reck 

Full Text 

Description


Background: IPI is a fully human monoclonal antibody that potentiates immune response by inhibiting CTLA-4. CA184-041 is a double-blind, randomized phase 2 study of IPI combination with P/C in chemotherapy- naïve recurrent/metastatic lung cancer. Methods: 204 pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive: IPI + concurrent schedule (CON) IV P/C, IPI + phased schedule (PHA) P/C, or P/C alone (PBO). IPI was administered at 10 mg/kg q3wks starting with cycle (c) 1 x 4 (CON) or starting with c 3 x 4 (PHA) then q3mo. P/C was given as 175 mg/m2 and AUC=6 q3wks x 6. Efficacy was assessed by immune-related response criteria (irRC) and mWHO. The primary endpoint compared immune-related PFS (irPFS) between CON vs PBO and PHA vs PBO. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced. Table 1 presents final irPFS using irRC, final PFS using mWHO, interim OS, and ir best overall response rate (irBORR) using irRC. Final OS results will be presented. IPI + P/C was generally well tolerated. IPI did not increase P/C related toxicity. Total gr 3/4 irAEs (pruritis, rash, alopecia, diarrhea, colitis) were 20% and 15% for CON and PHA regimens, respectively; all resolved. Gr 5 toxic epidermal necrolysis was seen in 1 pt for CON. Conclusion: Ipilimumab in combination with P/C met its primary endpoint by demonstrating superiority in irPFS compared with P/C alone with consistent findings across other efficacy endpoints. The PHA regimen appeared to demonstrate better efficacy than the CON regimen. These results support further study of ipilimumab in NSCLC.

Table 1
IPI + P/C P/C
CON (n=70) PHA (n=68) PBO (n=66)
Final irPFS, mo
95% CI
5.52
4.17, 6.74

5.68
4.76, 7.79

4.63
4.14, 5.52
p-value
HR
95% CI
0.094*
0.775
0.53, 1.13
0.026*
0.686
0.47, 1.01
Final mWHO PFS, mo
95% CI
4.11
2.76, 5.32
5.13
4.17, 5.72
4.21
2.76, 5.32
p-value
HR
95% CI
0.250
0.882
0.61,1.27
0.024*
0.691
0.48, 1.00
Interim OS, median mo
95% CI
11.01
8.38, 12.75
11.56
9.26, 14.39
9.99
6.97, 13.63
p-value
HR
95% CI
0.429
0.962
0.63, 1.48
0.104
0.748
0.48, 1.18
irBORR, %
95% CI
21.4
12.5, 32.9
32.4
21.5, 44.8
18.2
9.8, 29.6
*Statistically significant per Phase II criteria, one-sided log-rank test, α=0.10
 

Search within Meeting Abstracts

 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Related Content

Please login to access this content