Maintenance therapy of non-small cell lung cancer with erlotinib preserves quality of life

Publication date: May 19, 2010
Category: Chest tumors
Publisher: ESMO
Authors: E. Juhász; J.H. Kim; L. Stelmakh; S. Cicenas; G. Klingelschmitt 

Full Text 

Description

Introduction

The humanistic burden of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is high, with patients experiencing debilitating symptoms such as dyspnoea, cough, pain, loss of appetite and haemoptysis. Because current treatments for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC are not curative, their impact on quality of life (QoL) is an important consideration in a patient population whose QoL is already compromised.

The SATURN study compared the effects of maintenance therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib, or placebo on progression-free survival (PFS) in 889 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. The study also included the secondary endpoints: symptomatic progression, and time to deterioration in Trial Outcome Index (TOI) and QoL.

Methods

QoL was assessed until progression of disease or withdrawal using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire. The impact of erlotinib on the time to appearance of three key symptoms (pain, cough and dyspnoea) was explored. TOI, defined as the sum of the scores of the physical and functional wellbeing and lung cancer subscales of the FACT-L instrument, was designed to measure the physical functioning of patients with NSCLC.

Results

Overall, erlotinib improved PFS by 41% compared with placebo. In patients receiving erlotinib, QoL was not negatively impacted compared with those receiving placebo, with no differences in time to symptomatic progression (HR=0.91 [0.74-1.12]), time to deterioration in TOI (HR=1.06 [0.87-1.31]) or QoL (HR=0.96 [0.79-1.16]).

Time to pain and analgesics was significantly delayed in patients receiving erlotinib compared with placebo (HR=0.61 [0.42-0.88] and HR=0.66 [0.46-0.94], respectively), with a non-significant trend towards delayed time to appearance of cough ((HR=0.77, [0.49-1.21]) and dyspnoea (HR=0.75 [0.48-1.17]). Outcomes were similar in patients with stable disease prior to erlotinib therapy.

Conclusion

The benefits in survival seen with erlotinib first-line maintenance therapy in NSCLC are achieved with no negative impact on QoL until progression of disease, thereby allowing patients to spend more time with their families, and to remain active and contributing members of their communities for longer.


 

Search within Meeting Abstracts

 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Related Content

Please login to access this content